|
友情提示：本站提供全国400多所高等院校招收硕士、博士研究生入学考试历年考研真题、考博真题、答案，部分学校更新至2012年，2013年；均提供收费下载。 下载流程： 考研真题 点击“考研试卷””下载; 考博真题 点击“考博试卷库” 下载
南京农业大学
2006 年攻读硕士学位研究生入学考试试题
本试题共 16 页,第 1 页
试题编号：326 试题名称：基础英语
注意：答题（含填空）一律答在答题纸上，答在草稿纸或试卷上一律
无效
试 卷 一
Part I Reading Comprehension (two points each ,40 points))
Directions: In this section there are four passages followed by twenty multiple-choices.
Read the passages carefully and then mark your answer in yourAnswer Sheet.
Text A
―Partnership‖ between government and private business is much in vogue. Bill
Clinton, for one, is all for it. Government should not seek to displace private enterprise,
he says, but strive to help it work better. And government has much to learn from
business: if bureaucracies can be confronted with some of the incentives and disciplines
that work in the private sector, they too can become more efficient..
Britain’s Conservative government has said similar things for years---admittedly,
with more emphasis on what government learn from private enterprise than on what the
state can do for business. So widely has this notion of partnership spread that Britain’s
Labour Party, which has traditionally seen the private sector as an obstacle to success, is
suddenly an enthusiastic believer. It has published a document on ―promoting a
partnership between public and private finance‖, arguing that private capital should be
used, to an even greater extent than already envisaged by the Tory government, to pay
for investment in public infrastructure—which, in the Labour Party’s view, means not
merely roads and bridges but also ―social infrastructure‖ such as ―Child –care
facilities.‖
In Britain, as in America and many other industrial countries, this particular form
of partnership---the use of private capital for public investment—is proving especially
beguiling. Unfortunately, this is so mainly for bad reasons. Before a suspiciously broad
consensus moves too far from speech-making to action, and a policy that seems to offer
something to everyone goes wrong, some careful thinking is called for.
The main bad reason for proposing this new financial partnership is that it makes
for convenient bookkeeping---so much so that all sorts of apparently worthwhile
investments start to look costless. The argument, at its crudest, goes as follows. The
country plainly needs a new road. The government could build it---but how would it
meet the cost? Higher taxes would be unpopular. That leaves borrowing. There are good
reasons to pay for an investment---which yields its benefits over many years---by
borrowing over a span of time. But another difficulty arises: most industrial-country
governments are already borrowing too much. The governments of Britain and America
are both struggling to cut their financial deficits. Adding to public borrowing looks out
免责声明：本文系转载自网络，如有侵犯，请联系我们立即删除，另：本文仅代表作者个人观点，与本网站无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实，对本文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。
|
文章搜索
您现在的位置： 
